<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nov 2nd (day 21): Obviously wrong truths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sketches.bumblebeelabs.com/nov-2nd-day-21-obviously-wrong-truths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sketches.bumblebeelabs.com/nov-2nd-day-21-obviously-wrong-truths/</link>
	<description>Ideas, unorganized</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomasz Wegrzanowski</title>
		<link>http://sketches.bumblebeelabs.com/nov-2nd-day-21-obviously-wrong-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-8617</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz Wegrzanowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/?p=281#comment-8617</guid>
		<description>Check kernel mailing list every now and then - gcc has plenty of bugs. I was bitten by one ages ago too, something related to signedness and long longs, I don&#039;t remember the specifics any more.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many of gcc bugs are things that are underspecified in C standard, but just because C standard allows you to make a compliant compiler that makes every single real world program incorrect doesn&#039;t make it not-a-bug.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Standard libraries for C and Java tend to have few bugs because they&#039;re so tiny. Standard and semi-standard libraries for Ruby, Python, or Perl tend to be filled with bugs because they do so much.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At some point you need to give up this belief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check kernel mailing list every now and then &#8211; gcc has plenty of bugs. I was bitten by one ages ago too, something related to signedness and long longs, I don&#39;t remember the specifics any more.</p>
<p>Many of gcc bugs are things that are underspecified in C standard, but just because C standard allows you to make a compliant compiler that makes every single real world program incorrect doesn&#39;t make it not-a-bug.</p>
<p>Standard libraries for C and Java tend to have few bugs because they&#39;re so tiny. Standard and semi-standard libraries for Ruby, Python, or Perl tend to be filled with bugs because they do so much.</p>
<p>At some point you need to give up this belief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anything you think is either unoriginal, wrong or both &#171; Bumblebee Labs Blog</title>
		<link>http://sketches.bumblebeelabs.com/nov-2nd-day-21-obviously-wrong-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-7950</link>
		<dc:creator>Anything you think is either unoriginal, wrong or both &#171; Bumblebee Labs Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com/?p=281#comment-7950</guid>
		<description>[...] first discovered this obviously wrong truth when I was doing my honors thesis. Time and again, I would come up with a novel idea or a neat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first discovered this obviously wrong truth when I was doing my honors thesis. Time and again, I would come up with a novel idea or a neat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

